From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ANDREWS v. HAUN

Supreme Court of Utah
Aug 18, 1989
779 P.2d 229 (Utah 1989)

Opinion

No. 890360.

August 18, 1989.

Original Proceeding in this Court.

Timothy K. Ford, Seattle, Wash., Gordon G. Greiner, Mary V. Stolcis, Sandra Goldman, Patricia A. Rooney, Denver, Colo., Robert M. Anderson, Salt Lake City, for petitioner.

Robert R. Wallace, T.J. Tsakalos, Daniel S. McConkie, Salt Lake City, for respondents.


This case is here as a petition for extraordinary relief. It appears from the incomplete submission of the parties, both petitioner and the State, that the Board of Pardons erred in not disclosing certain documents which were apparently before the Board, as required by article VII, section 12, Constitution of Utah. However, the decision of the Board demonstrates that it did not rely on the undisclosed information to any significant extent in declining to commute petitioner's death sentence.

If Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 106 S.Ct. 2595, 91 L.Ed.2d 335 (1986), has application in this case and if error were committed under Ford, we view the error as harmless.

The petition is denied.

HOWE, Associate C.J., concurs in the result only, not being convinced that the Board of Pardons erred.


Summaries of

ANDREWS v. HAUN

Supreme Court of Utah
Aug 18, 1989
779 P.2d 229 (Utah 1989)
Case details for

ANDREWS v. HAUN

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM ANDREWS, PETITIONER, v. PETE HAUN, AS CHAIRMAN OF THE UTAH BOARD…

Court:Supreme Court of Utah

Date published: Aug 18, 1989

Citations

779 P.2d 229 (Utah 1989)

Citing Cases

Tillman v. Cook

he direct appeal, should be applied retroactively to the defendant's conviction or death penalty hearing,…

Foote v. Utah Bd. of Pardons

Dunn v. Cook, 791 P.2d 873 (Utah 1990).See, Hatch v. DeLand, 790 P.2d 49 (Utah Ct. App. 1990); cf. Andrews v.…