From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andrews v. Glendale

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Nov 17, 2009
297 S.W.3d 648 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. ED93219.

November 17, 2009.

Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission.

Dean L. Christianson, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Mark R. Bates, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.



ORDER


James Andrews (Claimant) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying benefits in connection with Claimant's back condition. Claimant contends that the Commission erred by imposing a higher standard of proof than the law requires on the issue of causation.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Andrews v. Glendale

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Nov 17, 2009
297 S.W.3d 648 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Andrews v. Glendale

Case Details

Full title:James ANDREWS, Employee/Appellant, v. CITY OF GLENDALE…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Nov 17, 2009

Citations

297 S.W.3d 648 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)