From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andrews v. Dretke

United States District Court, N.D. Texas
Sep 18, 2003
NO. 3-03-CV-1605-L (N.D. Tex. Sep. 18, 2003)

Opinion

NO. 3-03-CV-1605-L

September 18, 2003


INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE AND NOTICE OF RIGHT TO OBJECT


On this date the United States magistrate judge made written findings and a recommended disposition of petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus in the above-styled and numbered cause. The United States district clerk shall serve a copy of these findings and recommendations on all parties by certified mail, return receipt requested. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), any party who desires to object to these findings and recommendations must file and serve written objections within ten (10) days after being served with a copy. A party filing objections must specifically identify those findings and recommendations to which objections are being made. The district court need not consider frivolous, conclusory or general objections. The failure to file such written objections to these proposed findings and recommendations shall bar that party from obtaining a de novo determination by the district court. Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404, 410 (5th Cir. 1982). See also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150(1985). Additionally, the failure to file written objections to proposed findings and recommendations within ten (10) days after being served with a copy shall bar the aggrieved party from appealing the factual findings and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge that are accepted or adopted by the district court, except upon grounds of plain error or manifest injustice. Douglass v. United Services Automobile Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1417 (5th Cir. 1996).


Summaries of

Andrews v. Dretke

United States District Court, N.D. Texas
Sep 18, 2003
NO. 3-03-CV-1605-L (N.D. Tex. Sep. 18, 2003)
Case details for

Andrews v. Dretke

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE RAY ANDREWS Petitioner, vs. DOUGLAS DRETKE, Director Texas…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas

Date published: Sep 18, 2003

Citations

NO. 3-03-CV-1605-L (N.D. Tex. Sep. 18, 2003)

Citing Cases

Wedington v. United States

It is additionally noted that Petitioner is not incarcerated within the confines of this district and there…

Oliver v. Delbalso

Clearly, Petitioner's assertions that his Pennsylvania state court homicide conviction was the end result of…