Opinion
CV-20-11-GF-BMM
04-22-2022
CARLOS L. ANDREWS, Plaintiff, v. LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant.
ORDER
Brian Morris, Chief District Judge
Plaintiff Carlos Andrews (“Andrews”) has filed a Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration of Appellant's Motion for Production of Transcripts at the Government's Expense (Doc. 151), a Motion to Request Certification of Non-Frivolous Appeal (Doc. 155), and an Amended Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Doc. 157). Each Motion centers around the production of transcripts at the expense of the Government. The Motions come in response to the Court's order dated February 8, 2022, that denied Andrews's initial Motion for Production at the Government's Expense (Doc. 146). (Doc. 150). The Court cited Andrews's failure to establish permission to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 753(f). The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has since granted Andrews permission to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. (Carlos Andrews v. Megan Brennan, No. 22-35081 (9th. Cir. 2022), (Doc. 10)). The Ninth Circuit also has granted Andrews's Motion for Production of Transcripts at the Government's Expense. Id.
ORDER
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Andrews's Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration of Appellant's Motion for Production of Transcripts at the Government's Expense (Doc. 151), Motion to Request Certification of Non-Frivolous Appeal (Doc. 155), and Amended Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Doc. 157) are DENIED as moot.