From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andrews v. Cone

U.S.
Feb 20, 1888
124 U.S. 720 (1888)

Opinion

Submitted January 16, 1888. Decided February 20, 1888.

Mr. George F. Edmunds and Mr. J.C. Clayton for appellants.

Mr. Thomas Wilson for appellee.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.


This is an appeal by the plaintiffs in a suit in equity in the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota, from a decree dismissing the bill. The suit was brought for the infringement of the "driven well" patent which was the subject of the decision of this court in Andrews v. Hovey, 123 U.S. 267, and in which case an application for a rehearing has just been denied. The decree below in Andrews v. Hovey dismissed the bill, and this court affirmed it, holding the patent to have been invalid. In the present case there is a written stipulation, filed in this court, signed by the counsel of record here, that this case shall abide the result of the case of Andrews v. Hovey, in this court, and that the decree and mandate herein shall be the same as the decree and mandate in that case, except that no costs shall be taxed or awarded, or disbursements or officers' fees allowed or awarded, in this case, in favor of or against either party hereto, and that each party shall pay his own costs and disbursements. In accordance with such stipulation,

The decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed, subject to the above recited provisions of the stipulation.


Summaries of

Andrews v. Cone

U.S.
Feb 20, 1888
124 U.S. 720 (1888)
Case details for

Andrews v. Cone

Case Details

Full title:ANDREWS v . CONE

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 20, 1888

Citations

124 U.S. 720 (1888)