From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andrews v. Concrete Placing Company

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 9, 1966
183 So. 2d 685 (Fla. 1966)

Opinion

No. 34798.

March 9, 1966.

Writ of Certiorari to Florida Industrial Commission.

Howard N. Pelzner, Miami, for petitioner and cross-respondent.

Rose Marlow, Miami, for Concrete Placing Co. and Michigan Mut. Liability Co., respondents and cross-petitioners.

Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondent.


By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date 27 August 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition and cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.

The request of petitioner for attorney's fees is denied. The request of cross-respondent for attorney's fees is granted and a fee of $100 is awarded.

THOMAS Acting C.J., and ROBERTS, DREW, O'CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Andrews v. Concrete Placing Company

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 9, 1966
183 So. 2d 685 (Fla. 1966)
Case details for

Andrews v. Concrete Placing Company

Case Details

Full title:HENRY ANDREWS, PETITIONER, CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. CONCRETE PLACING COMPANY…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Mar 9, 1966

Citations

183 So. 2d 685 (Fla. 1966)