With respect to her state law claims against the Bains, which claims are predicated on Packwood's "removal from his home" and "his subsequent detention" (see Amended Complaint ¶ 78), Wood will be directed to show cause why such claims should not be dismissed for lack of standing, as Wood does not assert she was "removed" or placed in "detention" by anyone, let alone as a result of some action on the part of the Bains. See Andrews v. County of Hawaii, 2012 WL 425167, at *8 (D. Haw. February 9, 2012) (holding a plaintiff does not have standing to assert false arrest claim based on arrest of family member). Additionally, Wood will be directed to show cause why her claims against the Bains should not be dismissed for failure to serve, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(5),
Equitable estoppel involves a circumstance in which a defendant is estopped from asserting the statute of limitations as a defense. Andrews v. Cnty. of Hawaii, Civ. No. 10–00749 DAE–KSC, 2012 WL 425167, at *6 (D.Haw. Feb. 9, 2012). One invoking equitable estoppel “must show that he or she has detrimentally relied on the representation or conduct of the person sought to be estopped, and that such reliance was reasonable.”