From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andrews v. Altamtrano

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 28, 2006
No. CIV S-05-0619 DFL DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-0619 DFL DAD P.

August 28, 2006


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed July 10, 2006, this court directed plaintiff to file, within thirty days, a status report. Thirty days have since passed, and plaintiff has not filed a status report or otherwise responded to the court's order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.See Local Rule 11-110.

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Andrews v. Altamtrano

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 28, 2006
No. CIV S-05-0619 DFL DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2006)
Case details for

Andrews v. Altamtrano

Case Details

Full title:LEON ANDREWS, Plaintiff, v. ALTAMTRANO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 28, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-05-0619 DFL DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2006)