From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andrews v. Allison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 3, 2021
No. 2:21-cv-0331 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0331 CKD P

06-03-2021

YANCY ROBERT ANDREWS, Plaintiff, v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On April 20, 2021, plaintiff was given thirty days within which to file an amended complaint and completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with t he April 20, 2021 order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff has not responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Andrews v. Allison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 3, 2021
No. 2:21-cv-0331 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Andrews v. Allison

Case Details

Full title:YANCY ROBERT ANDREWS, Plaintiff, v. KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 3, 2021

Citations

No. 2:21-cv-0331 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 3, 2021)