From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andrew v. Mayorkas

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Nov 13, 2024
2:24-cv-01375-JLR (W.D. Wash. Nov. 13, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-01375-JLR

11-13-2024

RWANGOKO ANDREW, Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al., Defendants.

TESSA M. GORMAN United States Attorney Michelle R. Lambert MICHELLE R. LAMBERT, NYS #4666657 Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Western District of Washington Attorneys for Defendants I certify that this memorandum contains 213 words, in compliance with the Local Civil Rules SUMMIT LAW GROUP, PLLC Diana Siri Breaux DIANA SIRI BREAUX, WSBA #46112 PATTERSON BELKNAP WEBB & TYLER LLP Steven A. Zalesin STEVEN A. ZALESIN*, NYS #2070134 Stephanie Sofer STEPHANIE SOFER*, NYS #5882477 Emma Guido Brill EMMA GUIDO BRILL*, NYS #5562699 Pro Hac Vice Admitted Attorneys for Plaintiff


Noted for Consideration: November 12, 2024

TESSA M. GORMAN

United States Attorney

Michelle R. Lambert

MICHELLE R. LAMBERT, NYS #4666657

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office

Western District of Washington

Attorneys for Defendants

I certify that this memorandum contains 213 words, in compliance with the Local Civil Rules

SUMMIT LAW GROUP, PLLC

Diana Siri Breaux

DIANA SIRI BREAUX, WSBA #46112

PATTERSON BELKNAP WEBB & TYLER LLP

Steven A. Zalesin

STEVEN A. ZALESIN*, NYS #2070134

Stephanie Sofer

STEPHANIE SOFER*, NYS #5882477

Emma Guido Brill

EMMA GUIDO BRILL*, NYS #5562699

Pro Hac Vice Admitted

Attorneys for Plaintiff

STIPULATED MOTION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

JAMES L. ROBART, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Rwangoko Andrew and Defendants, through their respective counsel, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6 and Local Rules 10(g) and 16, and hereby jointly stipulate and move for a 45-day extension of the deadline for Defendants to respond to the Complaint. A court may modify a deadline for good cause. Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b). Continuing pretrial and trial dates is within the discretion of the trial judge. See King v. State of California, 784 F.2d 910, 912 (9th Cir. 1986). Good cause exists to extend Defendants' response deadline to December 27, 2024.

Plaintiff brings this lawsuit pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act and the Mandamus Act to compel the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) to adjudicate the Forms I-730, Refugee/Asylee Relative Petitions, that Plaintiff filed on behalf of his wife and children in December 2018. Recently, USCIS has transferred the petitions to the USCIS Nairobi Field Office for scheduling of the interviews. The parties seek this extension to allow the petitions to reach the Nairobi Field Office. At that time, the parties will have a better understanding of the timeframe required to complete the processing of the petitions.

Therefore, the parties agree to and propose that Defendants' deadline to respond to the Complaint be extended to December 27, 2024.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Defendants' deadline to respond to the Complaint is extended to December 27, 2024. It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Andrew v. Mayorkas

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Nov 13, 2024
2:24-cv-01375-JLR (W.D. Wash. Nov. 13, 2024)
Case details for

Andrew v. Mayorkas

Case Details

Full title:RWANGOKO ANDREW, Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Nov 13, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-01375-JLR (W.D. Wash. Nov. 13, 2024)