From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andrew D. Suski, Philip Goldman, Suski Chevrolet Buick, Inc. v. Cheyenne United Statesewick, Ed United Statesewick, & Bentley's Best, LLC

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jul 28, 2015
866 N.W.2d 452 (Mich. 2015)

Opinion

Docket No. 151285. COA No. 322895.

2015-07-28

Andrew D. SUSKI, Philip Goldman, Suski Chevrolet Buick, Inc., Suski Used Cars, LLC, and Suski Used Cars of Lapeer, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. Cheyenne USEWICK, Ed Usewick, and Bentley's Best, LLC, Defendants, and Cheyenne Usewick and Ed Usewick, Counter–Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. Andrew D. Suski and Philip Goldman, Counter–Defendants–Appellees.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 11, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

Andrew D. Suski, Philip Goldman, Suski Chevrolet Buick, Inc. v. Cheyenne United Statesewick, Ed United Statesewick, & Bentley's Best, LLC

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jul 28, 2015
866 N.W.2d 452 (Mich. 2015)
Case details for

Andrew D. Suski, Philip Goldman, Suski Chevrolet Buick, Inc. v. Cheyenne United Statesewick, Ed United Statesewick, & Bentley's Best, LLC

Case Details

Full title:Andrew D. SUSKI, Philip Goldman, Suski Chevrolet Buick, Inc., Suski Used…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Jul 28, 2015

Citations

866 N.W.2d 452 (Mich. 2015)
498 Mich. 868