From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andres v. Joy Mining Machinery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 3, 2014
C.A. No. 11-33 Erie (W.D. Pa. Nov. 3, 2014)

Opinion

C.A. No. 11-33 Erie

11-03-2014

ROBERT F. ANDRES, JR., Plaintiff, v. JOY MINING MACHINERY, et al, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER This civil action was received by the Clerk of Court on February 9, 2011, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation, filed on October 14, 2014, recommended that the motion for contempt filed by Plaintiff [ECF No. 93] be denied in part and dismissed in part. Service was made on all parties by electronic notice (NEF). No objections were filed. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 3rd Day of November, 2014;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for contempt filed by Plaintiff [ECF No. 93] is DENIED in part and DISMISSED in part.

The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated October 14, 2014, is adopted as the opinion of the court.

11/3/2014

/s/_________

ARTHUR J. SCHWAB

United States District Judge
cc: Susan Paradise Baxter

U.S. Magistrate Judge

all parties of record ___


Summaries of

Andres v. Joy Mining Machinery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 3, 2014
C.A. No. 11-33 Erie (W.D. Pa. Nov. 3, 2014)
Case details for

Andres v. Joy Mining Machinery

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT F. ANDRES, JR., Plaintiff, v. JOY MINING MACHINERY, et al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 3, 2014

Citations

C.A. No. 11-33 Erie (W.D. Pa. Nov. 3, 2014)