From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andrek v. Iowa Packers Express, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 24, 1969
33 A.D.2d 700 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

November 24, 1969


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant Iowa Packers Express, Inc. appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 11, 1968, as granted the motions of plaintiffs George, John and Anne Andrek to set aside as inadequate the jury verdict in their favor and ordered a new trial on the issue of damages as to said plaintiffs, unless said defendant would consent to the entry of judgment in increased amounts within a specified time. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs, motions to set aside the jury verdict as to plaintiffs George, John and Anne Andrek denied, and jury verdict as to said plaintiffs reinstated. In our opinion, in view of the sharp issues of fact with respect to the existence, nature and extent of the injuries alleged to have been sustained by the respective respondents, it cannot be said that the jury's verdict was inadequate as to them. Accordingly, the verdict as to them should not have been set aside. Christ, Acting, P.J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Andrek v. Iowa Packers Express, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 24, 1969
33 A.D.2d 700 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Andrek v. Iowa Packers Express, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE ANDREK et al., Respondents, et al., Plaintiff, v. IOWA PACKERS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 24, 1969

Citations

33 A.D.2d 700 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Citing Cases

Mansfield v. Graff

Plaintiff was married three weeks after the accident and honeymooned in Hawaii, factors undoubtedly…

James v. Shanley

We have held that "The fixation of damages in personal injury actions is peculiarly the function of the jury…