From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andreesen v. Chi., Cent. & Pac. R.R. Co.

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Feb 5, 2020
943 N.W.2d 76 (Iowa Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 19-0057

02-05-2020

Brian ANDREESEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHICAGO, CENTRAL & PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, d/b/a Canadian National Railway Company, Defendant-Appellee.

Fredric A. Bremseth of Bremseth Law Firm, Minnetonka, Minnesota, and Robert M. Livingston of Stuart Tinley Law Firm, LLP, Council Bluffs, for appellant. Kellen B. Bubach and R. Todd Gaffney of Finley Law Firm, P.C., Des Moines, and Charles H. Russell, III of Wise Carter Child & Caraway, P.A., Jackson, Mississippi, for appellee.


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION See Iowa R. App. P. 6.904

A plaintiff appeals the district court's denial of his motion for a new trial following a civil jury verdict in favor of the defendant. AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Andreesen v. Chi., Cent. & Pac. R.R. Co.

COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
Feb 5, 2020
943 N.W.2d 76 (Iowa Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Andreesen v. Chi., Cent. & Pac. R.R. Co.

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN ANDREESEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHICAGO, CENTRAL & PACIFIC…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

Date published: Feb 5, 2020

Citations

943 N.W.2d 76 (Iowa Ct. App. 2020)

Citing Cases

Holmes v. Pomeroy

Instead, "[w]hen an improper remark is made by counsel in the course of jury argument, it is the duty of the…