From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andree v. Hoy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 24, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02020-CMA-KMT (D. Colo. Jan. 24, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02020-CMA-KMT

01-24-2012

KIMBERLY L. ANDREE, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH HOY, individually and in his official capacity as the Sheriff of Eagle County, Defendant.


Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya


MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA

This matter is before the court on the "Joint Stipulated Motion for Protective Order" (Doc. No. 17, filed Jan. 23, 2012). The Motion is DENIED and the proposed Protective Order is REFUSED. The parties are granted leave to submit a motion for protective order and revised form of protective order consistent with the comments contained here.

Gillard v. Boulder Valley School District, 196 F.R.D. 382 (D. Colo. 2000), set out certain requirements for the issuance of a blanket protective order such as the one sought here. Among other things, any information designated by a party as confidential must first be reviewed by a lawyer who will certify that the designation as confidential is "based on a good faith belief that [the information] is confidential or otherwise entitled to protection." Gillard, 196 F.R.D. at 386. The proposed Protective Order does not comply with this requirement of Gillard.

Therefore, it is ORDERED that the Motion for Protective Order is DENIED without prejudice, and the proposed Protective Order is REFUSED.


Summaries of

Andree v. Hoy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 24, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02020-CMA-KMT (D. Colo. Jan. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Andree v. Hoy

Case Details

Full title:KIMBERLY L. ANDREE, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH HOY, individually and in his…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jan 24, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02020-CMA-KMT (D. Colo. Jan. 24, 2012)