From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andras v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 18, 2019
Case No. 18-cv-10192 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 18, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 18-cv-10192

03-18-2019

NICOLE ANDRAS, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


ORDER (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF #10) , (2) DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF #11), AND (3) REMANDING THIS ACTION FOR FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS

In this action, Plaintiff Nicole Andras challenges the denial of her application for disability insurance benefits. (See Compl., ECF #1.) Andras and Defendant Commissioner of Social Security have now filed cross-motions for summary judgment. (See Motions, ECF ## 10, 11.)

On February 11, 2019, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation in which she recommended that the Court grant Andras' motion, deny the Commissioner's motion, and remand this action to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (the "R&R"). (See R&R, ECF #17.) At the conclusion of the R&R, the Magistrate Judge informed the parties that if they wanted to seek review of her recommendation, they needed to file specific objections with the Court within fourteen days. (See id. at Pg. ID 719-20.)

The Commissioner has not filed any objections to the R&R. The failure to object to an R&R releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). In addition, the failure to file objections to an R&R waives any further right to appeal. See Howard v. Sec'y of Health and Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987).

Accordingly, because the Commissioner has failed to file any objections to the R&R, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to grant Andras' Motion for Summary Judgment and deny the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment is ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that (1) Andras' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF #10) is GRANTED, (2) the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF #11) is DENIED, and (3) this action is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings consistent with the R&R and this order.

s/Matthew F. Leitman

MATTHEW F. LEITMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: March 18, 2019

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on March 18, 2019, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail.

s/Holly A. Monda

Case Manager

(810) 341-9764


Summaries of

Andras v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 18, 2019
Case No. 18-cv-10192 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 18, 2019)
Case details for

Andras v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:NICOLE ANDRAS, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 18, 2019

Citations

Case No. 18-cv-10192 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 18, 2019)