From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andrade v. United Fruit Company

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 25, 1963
312 F.2d 889 (2d Cir. 1963)

Opinion

No. 228, Docket 27812.

Argued January 25, 1963.

Decided January 25, 1963.

Leon Segan, New York City (Bernard Rolnick, Benjamin H. Siff, New York City, on brief), for plaintiff-appellant.

Eugene Underwood, New York City (Burlingham, Underwood, Barron, Wright White, John J. Crowley, New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

Before FRIENDLY, KAUFMAN and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.


We affirm in open court Judge Feinberg's denial of plaintiff's motion, F.R. Civ.Proc. 60(b), to set aside a verdict for defendant in a seaman's action, on the ground that a juror allegedly failed to disclose a fact relating to his employment which made him incapable of being a disinterested juror. There was no reason why the juror should have supposed his employment so disqualified him; if plaintiff's trial counsel desired further information concerning this, it was for him to obtain it on the voir dire.


Summaries of

Andrade v. United Fruit Company

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 25, 1963
312 F.2d 889 (2d Cir. 1963)
Case details for

Andrade v. United Fruit Company

Case Details

Full title:Rigoberto ANDRADE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED FRUIT COMPANY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Jan 25, 1963

Citations

312 F.2d 889 (2d Cir. 1963)