From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Andino v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 28, 1996
676 So. 2d 493 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 96-98.

June 28, 1996.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Brevard County, Richard O. Watson, J.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and S.C. Van Voorhees, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.


In this Anders appeal, we affirm the judgments and sentences imposed in each case, but strike the imposition of public defender's fees because the record does not establish that appellant was advised of his right to contest the amount of the fees. See Allmond v. State, 668 So.2d 1120 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). Although a separate final judgment for the public defender's fees stated that appellant may contest the amount within 30 days, that judgment does not show that a copy was served on appellant. On remand, the trial court may reconsider the imposition of the fees after compliance with Rule 3.720 (d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

JUDGMENTS and SENTENCES AFFIRMED; PUBLIC DEFENDER'S FEES STRICKEN; and REMANDED.

THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ. concur.


Summaries of

Andino v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 28, 1996
676 So. 2d 493 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Andino v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID MIRANDA ANDINO, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jun 28, 1996

Citations

676 So. 2d 493 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Woods v. State

The court having jurisdiction of the defendant-recipient may, at such stage of the proceedings as the court…

Wines v. State

The trial court further erred by failing to orally announce all discretionary costs and fees. Reyes v. State,…