Opinion
Filed September 6, 1906.
Error from the District Court of Kay County; before Bayard T. Hainer, Trial Judge.
S. H. Harris, for plaintiff in error.
C. W. Ransom, for defendant in error.
Opinion of the court by
It is conceded by counsed for plaintiff in error that the questions here involved are identical with those presented in the case of McCalla v. Acker, reported in the 78 Pac., at page 223, 200 U.S. 613; and upon the authority of that case, the judgment of the court below in this case is affirmed.
Hainer, J., who presided in the court below, not sitting; all the other Justices concurring.