From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Xcel Energy

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Feb 5, 2008
744 N.W.2d 236 (Minn. 2008)

Opinion

No. A07-2119.

February 5, 2008.

Considered and decided by the court en banc.


ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed October 15, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that "[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Russell A. Anderson Chief Justice


Summaries of

Anderson v. Xcel Energy

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Feb 5, 2008
744 N.W.2d 236 (Minn. 2008)
Case details for

Anderson v. Xcel Energy

Case Details

Full title:David A. ANDERSON, Respondent v. XCEL ENERGY, Self-Insured/G.E. Young…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Feb 5, 2008

Citations

744 N.W.2d 236 (Minn. 2008)