From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Worstell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 5, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00488-RPM (D. Colo. Oct. 5, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00488-RPM

10-05-2011

MITCHELL ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. B. WORSTELL, (No. 2172) individually and in his capacity as a paid peace officer and as an employee and/or agent of the Colorado Springs Police Department and the City of Colorado Springs; C. CALKINS, (No. 2047) individually and in his capacity as a paid peace officer and as an employee and/or agent of the Colorado Springs Police Department and the City of Colorado Springs; COLORADO SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT, in its capacity as an agent and/or independent contractor of the City of Colorado Springs; THE CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, in its capacity as a governmental entity and as the employer of Officers Worstell and Calkins and the Colorado Springs Police Department; JOHN DOES 1-7, whose names and identities are unknown, individually and in their capacity as governmental officers or employees, peace officers, and/or agents of the Colorado Springs Police Department and/or the City of Colorado Springs; and LISA N. PIEL, Defendants.


Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL APPELLANTS TO ORDER AND PAY FOR

TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING

On August 16, 2011, the plaintiff filed a motion to compel appellants to order and pay for transcript for July 14, 2011, hearing pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 10(b)(3). The defendants (appellants) filed their response on August 17, 2011. There was no reply. Because the requested transcript is not necessary and the motion is not timely, it is

ORDERED that the motion is denied.

BY THE COURT:

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Anderson v. Worstell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 5, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00488-RPM (D. Colo. Oct. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Anderson v. Worstell

Case Details

Full title:MITCHELL ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. B. WORSTELL, (No. 2172) individually and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 5, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00488-RPM (D. Colo. Oct. 5, 2011)