Opinion
No. 2:16-cv-2948 KJN P
06-08-2018
TUANJA EDWARD ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. M. VOONG, et al., Defendants.
ORDER AND FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
By order filed March 8, 2018, the court granted plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 18.) On March 22, 2018, plaintiff filed a notice of change of address. (ECF No. 20.) On April 25, 2018, the March 8, 2018 order was re-served on plaintiff at his new address. Thirty days from the date of re-service have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court's order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall appoint a district judge to this action; and
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: June 8, 2018
/s/_________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE An2948.fta(2)