From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 14, 2021
No. 2:21-cv-0749 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0749 CKD P

06-14-2021

ERIC Z. ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN, Defendant.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On May 5, 2021, plaintiff was granted 30 days within which to file a complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file a complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff has not responded to the May 5, 2021 order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Anderson v. Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 14, 2021
No. 2:21-cv-0749 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Anderson v. Unknown

Case Details

Full title:ERIC Z. ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 14, 2021

Citations

No. 2:21-cv-0749 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 14, 2021)