From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Turner

United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Eastern Division
Mar 30, 2006
No. 05-1167-T-An (W.D. Tenn. Mar. 30, 2006)

Opinion

No. 05-1167-T-An.

March 30, 2006


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT


On June 20, 2005, Plaintiff Steven L. Anderson, pro se, filed a motion for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was submitted for screening. On December 13, 2005, Plaintiff filed an amended motion. Plaintiff has now filed a motion for summary judgment. The motion is DENIED.

First, the matter is still being screened and, therefore, a response has not been ordered from the State. If a response is ordered, the parties will then have an opportunity to file the proper motions at the proper time. Additionally, the motion is denied because Plaintiff has not filed a supporting memorandum along with his motion as required by the local rules of this court. Plaintiff has referenced no facts in support of his motion to show that he is entitled to summary judgment. Consequently, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Turner

United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Eastern Division
Mar 30, 2006
No. 05-1167-T-An (W.D. Tenn. Mar. 30, 2006)
Case details for

Anderson v. Turner

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN L. ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. GLEN TURNER, Warden, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Eastern Division

Date published: Mar 30, 2006

Citations

No. 05-1167-T-An (W.D. Tenn. Mar. 30, 2006)