From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Trans Union, LLC

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 8, 2023
2:22-cv-01214-GMN-NJK (D. Nev. Feb. 8, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01214-GMN-NJK

02-08-2023

ERIKA ANDERSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TRANS UNION, LLC, Defendant.


ORDER [Docket No. 26]

Nancy J. Koppe United States Magistrate Judge

Pending before the Court is the parties' stipulation to extend discovery deadlines. Docket No. 26.

A request to extend discovery deadlines must include a statement specifying the discovery completed, a specific description of the discovery that remains, the reasons why the subject deadline cannot be met, and a proposed schedule for completing the outstanding discovery. Local Rule 26-3. The request must also be supported by a showing of good cause. Id. The good cause analysis turns on whether the subject deadlines cannot reasonably be met despite the exercise of diligence. Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992). This showing of diligence is measured by the movant's conduct throughout the entire period of time already allowed. CC.Mexicano.US, LLCv. AeroIIAviation, Inc., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169110, at *11-12 (D. Nev. Dec. 15, 2015). If diligence is not established, the Court's inquiry should end. Johnson, 975 F.2d at 609 (internal citation omitted). If the request is being made after the expiration of a subject deadline, a showing of excusable neglect is also required. Local Rule 263.

Here the parties have not demonstrated diligence. The parties submit that they did not conduct discovery to minimize litigation expenses pending resolution of Defendant's motion to transfer action. Docket No. 26 at 2. This conduct amounts to a self-imposed stay of discovery. Any change in the discovery schedule which affects the time for completing discovery must have Court approval. Fed.R.Civ.P. 29(b); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b). Here, the parties never requested, and the Corn! never ordered, a stay of discovery. See Docket. Therefore, the Court cannot find good cause and the inquiry ends.

Despite the parlies' lack of a proper showing, as a one-time corutesy to the parlies, the Com! GRANTS in part the parties' extension request. Docket No. 26. The scheduling order is MODIFIED as follows:

Amend Pleadings: Closed

Initial Experts: March 13, 2023

Rebuttal Experts: April 12, 2023

Discovery Cut-Off May 12, 2023

Dispositive Motions: June 12, 2023

Joint Pretrial Order: July 11, 2023, 30 days after resolution of the dispositive motions, or further Corul order

The parties must diligently conduct discovery.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Trans Union, LLC

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 8, 2023
2:22-cv-01214-GMN-NJK (D. Nev. Feb. 8, 2023)
Case details for

Anderson v. Trans Union, LLC

Case Details

Full title:ERIKA ANDERSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TRANS UNION, LLC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Feb 8, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-01214-GMN-NJK (D. Nev. Feb. 8, 2023)