From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Sunridge Mgmt. Grp.

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Jul 7, 2022
Civil Action 4:21-cv-02511 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 7, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 4:21-cv-02511

07-07-2022

SHAYLA ANDERSON and ROBERT EDWARDS, Plaintiffs. v. SUNRIDGE MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

GEORGE C. HANKS, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On June 15, 2022, the Court referred Defendants' Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 16) to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). See Dkt. 19. On June 21, 2022, Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation, recommending that the Court deny Defendants' Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. See Dkt. 22.

No objections to the Memorandum and Recommendation have been filed. Accordingly, the Court reviews the Memorandum and Recommendation for plain error on the face of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also FED. R. CIV. P. 72(B)(3).

Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that there is no plain error apparent from the face of the record. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:

(1) Judge Edison's Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 22) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court; and
(2) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 16) is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Sunridge Mgmt. Grp.

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Jul 7, 2022
Civil Action 4:21-cv-02511 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Anderson v. Sunridge Mgmt. Grp.

Case Details

Full title:SHAYLA ANDERSON and ROBERT EDWARDS, Plaintiffs. v. SUNRIDGE MANAGEMENT…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Jul 7, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 4:21-cv-02511 (S.D. Tex. Jul. 7, 2022)