From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Sterling Correctional Facility

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Dec 5, 2007
Civil Action No. 07-cv-02274-BNB (D. Colo. Dec. 5, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-cv-02274-BNB.

December 5, 2007


ORDER OF DISMISSAL


Applicant, Donald J. Anderson, currently is confined at an unspecified facility in Colorado Springs, Colorado. He initiated this action by submitting pro se a Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action and an Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

In an order entered on October 26, 2007, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland ordered Mr. Anderson to cure a deficiency in the case within thirty days. Specifically, Mr. Anderson was directed to submit a certified copy of his trust fund account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding this filing.

Mr. Anderson has failed within the time allowed to cure the designated deficiency as directed, i.e., he has failed to submit a certified copy of his trust fund account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding this filing. Rule 3 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts requires a "certificate of the warden or other appropriate officer of the institution in which the petitioner is confined as to the amount of money or securities on deposit to the petitioner's credit in any account in the institution." The Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action also notes this requirement. The October 26, 2007, order warned Mr. Anderson that if he failed to cure the designated deficiency within the time allowed, the application would be denied and the action would be dismissed without further notice. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the habeas corpus application is denied and the action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to cure. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion and affidavit for leave to proceed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 is denied as moot.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Sterling Correctional Facility

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Dec 5, 2007
Civil Action No. 07-cv-02274-BNB (D. Colo. Dec. 5, 2007)
Case details for

Anderson v. Sterling Correctional Facility

Case Details

Full title:DONALD J. ANDERSON, Applicant, v. STERLING CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, and THE…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Dec 5, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-cv-02274-BNB (D. Colo. Dec. 5, 2007)