Anderson v. State

Full title: CLOYZELL ANDERSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 20, 1975

314 So. 2d 595 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

No. 74-1376.

June 20, 1975.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; B.C. Muszynski, Judge.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Bruce Zeidel, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and C. Marie Bernard, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon a review of the record on appeal and after due consideration of the briefs we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been clearly demonstrated. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is Affirmed.

CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.

WALDEN, J., dissents, with opinion.

WALDEN, Judge (dissenting):

I respectfully dissent because of the trial error in refusing to order the State to reveal the identity of the confidential informant. Roviaro v. United States, 353 U.S. 53, 77 S.Ct. 623, 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957) and Spataro v. State, 179 So.2d 873 (2d DCA Fla. 1965).

I would reverse and remand for a new trial.