From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 10, 2023
No. SC2023-1042 (Fla. Oct. 10, 2023)

Opinion

SC2023-1042

10-10-2023

Peter Allen Anderson, Petitioner(s) v. State of Florida, Respondent(s)


Lower Tribunal No(s).: 592014CF000877A000XX

To the extent the petitioner seeks habeas relief, the petition is hereby denied as procedurally barred. A petition for extraordinary relief is not a second appeal and cannot be used to litigate or relitigate issues that were or could have been raised on direct appeal or in prior postconviction proceedings. See Denson v. State, 775 So.2d 288, 290 (Fla. 2000); Breedlove v. Singletary, 595 So.2d 8, 10 (Fla. 1992). To the extent the petitioner seeks to invoke the Court's all writs jurisdiction, the petition is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the petitioner has failed to cite an independent basis that would allow the Court to exercise its all writs authority and no such basis is apparent on the face of the petition. See Williams v. State, 913 So.2d 541, 543-44 (Fla. 2005); St. Paul Title Ins. Corp. v. Davis, 392 So.2d 1304, 1305 (Fla. 1980). No motion for rehearing will be entertained by this Court.

CANADY, COURIEL, GROSSHANS, FRANCIS, and SASSO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Anderson v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 10, 2023
No. SC2023-1042 (Fla. Oct. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Anderson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Peter Allen Anderson, Petitioner(s) v. State of Florida, Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Oct 10, 2023

Citations

No. SC2023-1042 (Fla. Oct. 10, 2023)