From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. State

New York State Court of Claims
Sep 21, 2017
# 2017-015-264 (N.Y. Ct. Cl. Sep. 21, 2017)

Opinion

# 2017-015-264 Claim No. 128944 Motion No. M-90761

09-21-2017

TERRANCE ANDERSON v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Terrance Anderson, Pro se Honorable Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General By: Michael T. Krenrich, Esq. Assistant Attorney General


Synopsis

Claimant's motion to compel disclosure was denied.

Case information

UID:

2017-015-264

Claimant(s):

TERRANCE ANDERSON

Claimant short name:

ANDERSON

Footnote (claimant name) :

Defendant(s):

THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Footnote (defendant name) :

Third-party claimant(s):

Third-party defendant(s):

Claim number(s):

128944

Motion number(s):

M-90761

Cross-motion number(s):

Judge:

FRANCIS T. COLLINS

Claimant's attorney:

Terrance Anderson, Pro se

Defendant's attorney:

Honorable Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General By: Michael T. Krenrich, Esq. Assistant Attorney General

Third-party defendant's attorney:

Signature date:

September 21, 2017

City:

Saratoga Springs

Comments:

Official citation:

Appellate results:

See also (multicaptioned case)

Decision

Claimant, proceeding pro se, moves to compel disclosure of certain records.

Claimant, an inmate, seeks damages for wrongful confinement to the Special Housing Unit at Great Meadow Correctional Facility following a Tier 3 hearing in which he was found guilty of violating certain disciplinary rules. A necessary prerequisite to a motion to compel disclosure is the service of a disclosure notice (CPLR § 3102 [a], [b]). A motion to compel compliance or a response is then appropriate "[i]f a person fails to respond to or comply with any request, notice, interrogatory, demand" (CPLR 3124). Defendant opposes the instant motion on the ground claimant has failed to serve any such request, notice, interrogatory or demand for disclosure. Inasmuch as claimant has not demonstrated that defendant failed to respond to a duly served notice for disclosure, the instant motion must be denied.

Accordingly, claimant's motion is denied.

September 21, 2017

Saratoga Springs, New York

FRANCIS T. COLLINS

Judge of the Court of Claims

Papers Considered:

1. Notice of Motion, dated July 5, 2017;
2. Affidavit of Terrance Anderson, sworn to on July 11, 2017;
3. Affirmation in Opposition, dated July 31, 2017, with exhibit A;
4. Affidavit of Terrance Anderson, sworn to on August 7, 2017, with exhibit A.


Summaries of

Anderson v. State

New York State Court of Claims
Sep 21, 2017
# 2017-015-264 (N.Y. Ct. Cl. Sep. 21, 2017)
Case details for

Anderson v. State

Case Details

Full title:TERRANCE ANDERSON v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Court:New York State Court of Claims

Date published: Sep 21, 2017

Citations

# 2017-015-264 (N.Y. Ct. Cl. Sep. 21, 2017)