From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Mar 10, 2017
211 So. 3d 374 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1D16–4656 1D16–4657

03-10-2017

William Kirk ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Jennifer J. Moore and Jason W. Rodriguez, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Jennifer J. Moore and Jason W. Rodriguez, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We sua sponte consolidate these appeals for disposition. Appellant seeks review of orders revoking his probation and sentencing him to prison. He argues in each case and the state properly concedes that by failing to conduct an appropriate plea colloquy before revoking appellant's probation and sentencing him, the trial court reversibly erred and violated the requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172(c). See Haug v. State , 151 So.3d 560 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). Accordingly, we REVERSE the orders revoking probation and the judgments and sentences entered thereon, and REMAND for further proceedings.

WOLF, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Anderson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Mar 10, 2017
211 So. 3d 374 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Anderson v. State

Case Details

Full title:William Kirk ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Mar 10, 2017

Citations

211 So. 3d 374 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)