From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Jun 6, 2017
219 So. 3d 1000 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1D15–4867

06-06-2017

Jared Tavar ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and William Pafford, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and William Pafford, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

WOLF, J.

Appellant raises two issues on appeal. We find only one issue has merit; we agree with appellant that the trial court erred when it failed to enter a written order adjudicating appellant competent to proceed before allowing appellant to represent himself in a bench trial. Therefore, we AFFIRM appellant's judgment and sentence, but REMAND for the trial court to enter a written order of competency nunc pro tunc. Mullens v. State , 197 So.3d 16, 37 (Fla. 2016).

LEWIS and WETHERELL, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Anderson v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Jun 6, 2017
219 So. 3d 1000 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Anderson v. State

Case Details

Full title:JARED TAVAR ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Jun 6, 2017

Citations

219 So. 3d 1000 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)