Opinion
No. 05-02-00477-CR.
Opinion Filed April 24, 2003. DO NOT PUBLISH, Tex.R.App.P. 47.
Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F99-48285-HJ. Affirmed.
Before Justices MORRIS, WRIGHT, and MOSELEY.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Robert Dennard Anderson appeals the revocation of his community supervision. Before a magistrate, appellant entered a negotiated guilty plea to a charge of possession with intent to deliver cocaine in an amount of one gram or more but less than four grams. The trial court adopted the magistrate's findings and found appellant guilty. Following the plea bargain agreement, the court assessed punishment at ten years' imprisonment, probated for five years, and a $500 fine. Subsequently, the State filed a motion to revoke probation. Appellant entered a negotiated plea of true to the State's allegations. The trial court found the allegations true, revoked appellant's community supervision, followed the plea bargain agreement, and assessed punishment at three years' imprisonment. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response. Appellant, however, did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.