From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Aug 15, 2000
31 S.W.3d 64 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED76043

Filed: August 15, 2000 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied October 25, 2000 Application for Transfer Denied December 5, 2000

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. William M. Corrigan.

Dave Hemingway, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, P.J. and Paul J. Simon and James R. Dowd, JJ.



ORDER

Carl Anderson, defendant, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Anderson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Aug 15, 2000
31 S.W.3d 64 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Anderson v. State

Case Details

Full title:CARL ANDERSON, Appellant, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Aug 15, 2000

Citations

31 S.W.3d 64 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)