From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. State

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Feb 23, 1984
344 N.W.2d 489 (N.D. 1984)

Opinion

Civ. No. 10509.

February 23, 1984.

Appeal from the District Court, Grand Forks County, Kirk Smith, J.

A.F. Arnason and Joel F. Arnason (argued), Grand Forks, for plaintiffs and appellees.

Thomas B. Tudor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Bank of North Dakota, Bismarck, for defendant and appellant.


The State, doing business as the Bank of North Dakota, has appealed from a judgment that only partially disposes of an action in which "more than one claim for relief is presented." Rule 54(b), N.D.R. Civ.P.

Because the requirement of Rule 54(b) that "the court may direct the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and upon an express direction for the entry of judgment" has not been met, the judgment is not final, but "is subject to revision at any time before the entry of judgment adjudicating all the claims and the rights and liabilities of all the parties." The partial disposition embodied in the judgment appealed from therefore is not ripe for review. Striegel v. Dakota Hills, Inc., 343 N.W.2d 785 (N.D. 1984).

The appeal is dismissed.

ERICKSTAD, C.J., and VANDE WALLE, PEDERSON, GIERKE and SAND, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Anderson v. State

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Feb 23, 1984
344 N.W.2d 489 (N.D. 1984)
Case details for

Anderson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Steven D. ANDERSON and Linda E. Anderson, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota

Date published: Feb 23, 1984

Citations

344 N.W.2d 489 (N.D. 1984)

Citing Cases

Williams Co. v. Hamilton

Rule 54(b), N.D.R.Civ.P." Anerson v. State, 344 N.W.2d 489 (N.D. 1984). Because Rule 54(b), N.D.R.Civ.P., has…

Union State Bank v. Woell

Rather, the import of those cases is that this Court will not consider an appeal in a multi-claim or…