See id. at 396. See Anderson v. State, 155 Ga. App. 25, 26 ( 270 SE2d 263) (1980) (avoid search pursuant to a warrant is not justified by discovery of contraband). The State argues that the order should nonetheless be affirmed because consent was given for the search.
"`To be valid, a search warrant must contain a description of the ... premises to be searched with such particularity as would enable a prudent person executing the warrant to locate the ... premises definitely and with reasonable certainty. [Cit.]'" Anderson v. State, 155 Ga. App. 25 ( 270 S.E.2d 263) (1980). There being no evidence to show that the address stated in the warrant was incorrect, "the trial court did not abuse its discretion in holding, in substance, that ... the officer could `ascertain and identify the place intended.' [Cit.
However, "[w]here the name of the owner or occupant is not given, the description of the premises must be exact." Garner v. State, 124 Ga. App. 33, 35 ( 182 S.E.2d 902). Accord Bell v. State, 124 Ga. App. 139, 140 ( 182 S.E.2d 901); Durrett v. State, 136 Ga. App. 114, 115 ( 220 S.E.2d 92); Anderson v. State, 155 Ga. App. 25, 26 ( 270 S.E.2d 263). Since description here was not exact in that the two towns were located some distance apart the trial judge's determination was not erroneous.