From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Mar 18, 2003
100 S.W.3d 142 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. ED 81628

March 18, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County; Steven H. Goldman, Judge.

Stacey F. Sullivan, Asistant State Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Anne E. Edgington, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Mary R. Russell, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J., and Booker T. Shaw, J.



ORDER


Andre Anderson ("movant") appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 on the merits without an evidentiary hearing. In his motion, movant claims he was denied effective assistance of counsel by the failure of his counsel to offer an involuntary intoxication instruction.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Anderson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Mar 18, 2003
100 S.W.3d 142 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Anderson v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Mar 18, 2003

Citations

100 S.W.3d 142 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)