From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Dec 6, 1949
43 So. 2d 322 (Ala. Crim. App. 1949)

Opinion

4 Div. 108.

December 6, 1949.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Barbour County, J.S. Williams, J.

Geo. C. Wallace, Clayton, and Jack Wallace, Clayton, for appellant.

In a prosecution under Code 1940, Tit. 14, § 399, it is the duty of the jury to fix the punishment. The action of the court fixing the punishment in this case constitutes reversible error. Smith v. State, 23 Ala. App. 72, 121 So. 692; Tanner v. State, 23 Ala. App. 116, 121 So. 693.

A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., and MacDonald Gallion, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Under the statute it was the duty of the jury to fix the period of imprisonment. The trial court, instead of the jury, having done so in this case, error is confessed. Code 1940, Tit. 14, § 399.


Count one of the indictment in this case charged the defendant with carnal knowledge of a girl over twelve and under sixteen years of age.

On the trial the jury returned the following verdict: "We, the Jury, find the defendant guilty as charged in Count One of said indictment. /s/ Yancy Hartzog, Foreman."

This was in response to the oral instructions of the trial judge in which he stated: "This jury isn't clothed with the right or the responsibility of saying what punishment shall be visited upon this defendant in the event he is found guilty. That is a responsibility which the Court carries alone."

The court fixed the punishment of the defendant at five years in the State penitentiary.

The prosecution under count one of the indictment is based on Sec. 399, Title 14, Code 1940. This statute makes it mandatory on the jury and not the court to fix the punishment.

This identical question was before this court in the fairly recent case of Fuller v. State, 32 Ala. App. 85, 21 So.2d 705. We cited in the opinion a long list of authorities sustaining our judgment of reversal.

With commendable candor the Assistant Attorney General, in his brief, confesses that there is reversible error in this record.

It is ordered that the judgment of the court below be reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Anderson v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Dec 6, 1949
43 So. 2d 322 (Ala. Crim. App. 1949)
Case details for

Anderson v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANDERSON v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Dec 6, 1949

Citations

43 So. 2d 322 (Ala. Crim. App. 1949)
43 So. 2d 322