From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 24, 1984
172 Ga. App. 202 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

68441.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 24, 1984.

Aggravated assault, etc. Dougherty Superior Court. Before Judge Kelley.

Donald E. Strickland, for appellant.

Hobart M. Hind, District Attorney, for appellee.


Defendant was convicted of the offenses of aggravated sodomy, child molestation, cruelty to children and aggravated assault (with intent to rape). Defendant appeals. Held:

Both enumerations of error have reference to objections to testimony about previous incidents of sexual crimes occurring five or six years prior to this charge as between the defendant and the prosecutrix and the defendant and the prosecutrix' sister. These enumerations will be considered together. Defendant contends that the obvious import of the testimony was to enflame the minds of the members of the jury and was tantamount to prosecuting the defendant for these unindicted offenses thereby prejudicing defendant's right to a fair trial. Also the court, in allowing the jury to consider this testimony, essentially approved of the prosecution of the defendant for alleged offenses totally removed and unrelated to the offenses alleged in such indictment. We do not agree. The sexual molestation of young children, regardless of sex or type of act, is sufficiently similar to the crimes charged in the case sub judice to make the evidence admissible. See Phelps v. State, 158 Ga. App. 219, 220 ( 279 S.E.2d 513); Miller v. State, 165 Ga. App. 487, 488-489 (2) ( 299 S.E.2d 174) (a nine-year span between the prior offenses); Copeland v. State, 160 Ga. App. 786 (1), 787 (4) ( 287 S.E.2d 120) (a twelve-year span between the prior offenses). Further, in child molestation cases evidence of similar or connected sexual offenses is admissible to corroborate the testimony of the victim, as well as to show the lustful disposition of the defendant. Felts v. State, 154 Ga. App. 571 (2) ( 269 S.E.2d 73); Phelps v. State, 158 Ga. App. 219 (2), supra; Ballweg v. State, 158 Ga. App. 576 (2) ( 281 S.E.2d 319). We find no merit in either of the two complaints here.

Judgment affirmed. Deen, P. J., and Sognier, J., concur.


DECIDED SEPTEMBER 24, 1984.


Summaries of

Anderson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 24, 1984
172 Ga. App. 202 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Anderson v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANDERSON v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 24, 1984

Citations

172 Ga. App. 202 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
322 S.E.2d 532

Citing Cases

Whited v. State

The nine-year-old victim's testimony concerning the May 19 events contains the elements of the crime of…

Sears v. State

The victim's testimony relating an earlier, unindicted act of molestation upon her by appellant was properly…