From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Aug 31, 2006
No. 03-05-00308-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 31, 2006)

Opinion

No. 03-05-00308-CR

Filed: August 31, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 of Williamson County, No. 04-3721-3, Honorable Donald Higginbotham, Judge Presiding. Affirmed.

Before Chief Justice LAW, Justices PURYEAR and WALDROP.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


A jury found appellant Terry James Anderson guilty of driving while intoxicated. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 49.04 (West 2003). The court assessed at 100-day jail term. Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969). Appellant received a copy of counsel's brief and was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.


Summaries of

Anderson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Aug 31, 2006
No. 03-05-00308-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 31, 2006)
Case details for

Anderson v. State

Case Details

Full title:TERRY JAMES ANDERSON, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Aug 31, 2006

Citations

No. 03-05-00308-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 31, 2006)