From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Shih

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Dec 23, 2020
951 N.W.2d 686 (Mich. 2020)

Opinion

SC: 161686 COA: 344549

12-23-2020

Laveta ANDERSON and Charles J. Taunt, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Jenny SHIH, D.O., Inocencio Cuesta, M.D., Malini Venkatram, M.D., Suchita Bheemreddy, M.D., Karthik Yadagiri, PT, Rupa Patel, PT, University Physician Group, VHS Physicians of Michigan, Harper-Hutzel Hospital, Legacy HHH, VHS Harper-Hutzel, Inc., VHS of Michigan, Inc., Legacy DMC, Tenet Healthcare Corporation, Botsford General Hospital, TheraMatrix, Inc., d/b/a TheraMatrix Physical Rehabilitation, TheraMatrix Physical Rehabilitation, TheraMatrix Physical Therapy Network, and TheraMatrix Physical Therapy Plan, Inc., Defendants, and The Wellness Plan, Defendant-Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 23, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Shih

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Dec 23, 2020
951 N.W.2d 686 (Mich. 2020)
Case details for

Anderson v. Shih

Case Details

Full title:LAVETA ANDERSON and CHARLES J. TAUNT, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. JENNY SHIH…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Dec 23, 2020

Citations

951 N.W.2d 686 (Mich. 2020)