From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Sherman

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 27, 2021
2:21-cv-00120-KJM-JDP (HC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00120-KJM-JDP (HC)

09-27-2021

HEATHER G. ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. STEWARD SHERMAN, Respondents.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 14, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 14, 2021, are adopted in full;

2. The amended petition, ECF No. 8, be dismissed without leave to amend; and

3. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Sherman

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 27, 2021
2:21-cv-00120-KJM-JDP (HC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Anderson v. Sherman

Case Details

Full title:HEATHER G. ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. STEWARD SHERMAN, Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 27, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-00120-KJM-JDP (HC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)