Anderson v. Runnels

Full title: JAMES W. ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. D. RUNNELS, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Sep 30, 2009

SACV-06-869-AHS (JWJ) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2009)

Opinion

JAMES W. ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. D. RUNNELS, Warden, Respondent. No. SACV-06-869-AHS (JWJ) United States District Court, C.D. California. September 30, 2009

          ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          ALICEMARIE H. STOTLER, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the instant Petition along with the attached Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the Report and Recommendation.

         IT IS ORDERED that a Judgment be issued denying the instant Petition and dismissing the action with prejudice.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve forthwith a copy of this Order and the Judgment of this date on counsel for Petitioner and Respondent.