From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Rubicam

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 8, 2010
14 N.Y.3d 909 (N.Y. 2010)

Opinion

No. 201062.

Submitted January 11, 2010.

Decided June 8, 2010.

Reported below, 68 AD3d 430.


Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. The order affirming the denial of the CPLR 4404 motion to set aside the verdict does not finally determine the action ( see Cuadrado v New York City Tr. Auth., 14 NY3d 748).


Summaries of

Anderson v. Rubicam

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 8, 2010
14 N.Y.3d 909 (N.Y. 2010)
Case details for

Anderson v. Rubicam

Case Details

Full title:KELVIN D. ANDERSON, Appellant, v. YOUNG RUBICAM, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 8, 2010

Citations

14 N.Y.3d 909 (N.Y. 2010)
904 N.Y.S.2d 688
930 N.E.2d 761