From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Ricks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 17, 2003
307 A.D.2d 569 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

93337

Decided and Entered: July 17, 2003.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Joseph Anderson, Malone, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Peters, Mugglin, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Following a tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting harassing an employee and damaging state property. According to the misbehavior report, about one week after receiving a new mattress, petitioner complained that it was ripped. When the reporting correction officer ordered petitioner to sign a disbursement form so he could be charged for a replacement mattress, petitioner responded, "Fuck-you, bitch, I ain't paying for nothing."

Substantial evidence of the charged misconduct was presented in the form of the detailed misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who wrote the misbehavior report after witnessing the conduct in question (see Matter of Law v. Goord, 301 A.D.2d 703, 704; Matter of Johnson v. Ricks, 297 A.D.2d 889, 889). Petitioner's assertion that the reporting officer filed the misbehavior report against him in retaliation for grievances that he had previously filed against her husband, who is also a correction officer, presented an issue of credibility for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Lopez v. Selsky, 300 A.D.2d 975, 975). Petitioner's remaining assertions have been examined and found to be without merit.

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Mugglin, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Ricks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 17, 2003
307 A.D.2d 569 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Anderson v. Ricks

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSEPH ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. THOMAS RICKS, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 17, 2003

Citations

307 A.D.2d 569 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
762 N.Y.S.2d 303