From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Quintana

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 7, 2011
Civil Action No. 09-179 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jul. 7, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-179 Erie.

July 7, 2011


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on July 16, 2009 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 19], filed on June 17, 2011, recommended that the Petition be denied because the claims raised by Petitioner are procedurally defaulted for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The parties were allowed fourteen (14) days from the date of service to file objections and service was made on Petitioner by certified mail. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 7th day of July, 2011;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED because the claims raised by Petitioner are procedurally defaulted for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 19] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on June 17, 2011, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

The Clerk is directed to mark the case closed.


Summaries of

Anderson v. Quintana

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 7, 2011
Civil Action No. 09-179 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jul. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Anderson v. Quintana

Case Details

Full title:ROBIN DESHAWN ANDERSON, et al., Petitioner, v. FRANCISCO QUINTANA, et…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 7, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-179 Erie (W.D. Pa. Jul. 7, 2011)