From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Pollard

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 16, 2019
No. 19-1372 (4th Cir. Aug. 16, 2019)

Opinion

No. 19-1372

08-16-2019

RYAN ANDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JASON W. POLLARD, Defendant - Appellee.

Ryan Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00686-REP) Before FLOYD, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ryan Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ryan Anderson appeals the district court's order dismissing his in forma pauperis complaint as frivolous, vexatious, and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Anderson v. Pollard, No. 3:18-cv-00686-REP (E.D. Va. Mar. 4, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Anderson v. Pollard

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 16, 2019
No. 19-1372 (4th Cir. Aug. 16, 2019)
Case details for

Anderson v. Pollard

Case Details

Full title:RYAN ANDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JASON W. POLLARD, Defendant …

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 16, 2019

Citations

No. 19-1372 (4th Cir. Aug. 16, 2019)

Citing Cases

Anderson v. Pollard

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Anderson v. Pollard, No.…