From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Pena

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 9, 2021
2:20-cv-01364 KJM DMC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-01364 KJM DMC

09-09-2021

CAMERON MILLS ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. C. PENA, Defendant.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Cameron Mills Anderson, an inmate proceeding pro se and under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claims Defendant C. Pena was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On August 9, 2021, the Court issued an order referring the case to its Post-Screening ADR Project and stayed the action for a period of 120 days. ECF No. 26. On September 8, 2021, after investigating the claims, speaking with the Plaintiff, and conferring with supervising counsel, Defendant filed a Motion to Opt Out of the ADR Project on the grounds that a settlement conference would not be beneficial.

Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS Defendant's Request, ECF No. 27, to Opt Out of the ADR Project.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Anderson v. Pena

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 9, 2021
2:20-cv-01364 KJM DMC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Anderson v. Pena

Case Details

Full title:CAMERON MILLS ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. C. PENA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 9, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-01364 KJM DMC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2021)