From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Anderson v. Pedalty

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 9, 2015
14-CV-00192 (W.D.N.Y. Apr. 9, 2015)

Opinion

14-CV-00192

04-09-2015

ROMERO ANDERSON, 06-A-0077, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW S. PEDALTY, S. SGT., ANTHONY SPAHALSKI, Corr/Off, SEAN F. DAVIS, Corr/Off, Defendants.


DECISION AND ORDER

The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On March 9, 2015, Magistrate Judge McCarthy filed a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 10), recommending that defendant Spahalski's motion to dismiss the Complaint (Dkt. No. 7) be denied.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby

ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge McCarthy's Report and Recommendation, defendant Spahalski's unopposed motion to dismiss the Complaint is denied

The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge McCarthy for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

HONORABLE RICHARD J. ARCARA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Dated: April 9, 2015


Summaries of

Anderson v. Pedalty

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 9, 2015
14-CV-00192 (W.D.N.Y. Apr. 9, 2015)
Case details for

Anderson v. Pedalty

Case Details

Full title:ROMERO ANDERSON, 06-A-0077, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW S. PEDALTY, S. SGT.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Apr 9, 2015

Citations

14-CV-00192 (W.D.N.Y. Apr. 9, 2015)

Citing Cases

Patterson v. Ludlow

For unopposed motions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b), the Court "must review the merits of…

Aliev v. U.S. Postal Serv.

Where there is a 12(b) motion that has not been opposed, the Court must review the merits of the motion and…