From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ANDERSON v. NAWA

Court of Appeal of California, First District
Jul 21, 1914
25 Cal.App. 799 (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)

Opinion

Civ. No. 1324.

July 21, 1914.

APPEALS from judgments of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. George A. Sturtevant, Judge.

The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Anderson v. Nawa, ante, p. 151.

F. A. Cutler, A. A. De Ligne, and H. W. Johnson, Jr., for Appellant.

J. J. Lerman, C. L. Tilden, and W. F. Postel, for Respondents.


The parties to the above entitled cause having stipulated that the appeals from the two judgments rendered in the said action in favor of the respondent. J. J. Lermen present questions identical to those presented in the appeals in the case, No. 1359, Anderson v. Nawa et al., (opinion filed July 17, 1914), ante, p. 151, [ 143 P. 555], and the said parties having further stipulated that the facts in both cases upon which the judgments of dismissal are respectively based are in all respects substantially the same, and having further stipulated that all briefs and arguments filed or made on the appeal from the judgment in favor of respondent Swayne Hoyt, a corporation (being case No. 1359, supra), may be considered as made and filed in the appeals from the judgments in favor of said respondent J. J. Lermen.

Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered upon the authority of the said case (No. 1359), and for the same reasons stated in the opinion filed therein, the first judgment, to wit, the judgment entered and recorded December 12, 1912, in favor of said respondent J. J. Lermen, is affirmed, and the appeal from the second judgment, to wit, the judgment entered and recorded February 14, 1913, is dismissed.


Summaries of

ANDERSON v. NAWA

Court of Appeal of California, First District
Jul 21, 1914
25 Cal.App. 799 (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
Case details for

ANDERSON v. NAWA

Case Details

Full title:ALDEN ANDERSON, Superintendent of Banks of the State of California…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District

Date published: Jul 21, 1914

Citations

25 Cal.App. 799 (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
25 Cal.App. 802
25 Cal.App. 801
143 P. 558

Citing Cases

Hayes v. Financial Indem. Co.

"Apart from this statute, the misuse of plaintiff's car . . . would not constitute a larceny, since there was…

State v. Lake

"To constitute the crime of larceny the intent which accompanies the act of taking must be the criminal…